boom: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, time
Weight: 0.54
, loud noise
Weight: 0.54
, publisher
Weight: 0.52
Siblings bubble
Weight: 0.34
, bubble bath
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.32
, software company
Weight: 0.32
, oil company
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(software company, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bubble bath, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bubble, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bubble bath, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(bubble bath, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(oil company, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(software company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(software company, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(boom, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(boom, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(boom, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bubble, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(software company, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(oil company, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(boom, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bubble bath, has quality bad)