bubble: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, obstacle
Weight: 0.55
Siblings bubble bath
Weight: 0.37
, boom
Weight: 0.34
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.32
, balloon
Weight: 0.32
, hangover
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
be bad in pcr 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hangover, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bubble bath, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(boom, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(bubble, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(boom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(boom, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(bubble, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hangover, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hangover, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(bubble, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bubble bath, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(bubble bath, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(bubble, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(bubble, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(bubble, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bubble, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(bubble, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bubble, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hangover, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(boom, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bubble, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bubble bath, has quality bad)