bootstrap: is hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.51
, framework
Weight: 0.47
, programming language
Weight: 0.47
, library
Weight: 0.45
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.32
, extraction
Weight: 0.31
, compression
Weight: 0.30
, ligation
Weight: 0.30
, fsck
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hard 1.00
is made hard 0.91
be hard for computers 0.80
is easy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(method, is hard)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bootstrap, is hard)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(programming language, is made hard)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bootstrap, is hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(method, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(programming language, is made hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(method, is hard)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, is hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(compression, is hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(compression, be hard for computers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(method, is hard)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(bootstrap, is hard)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(programming language, is made hard)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(bootstrap, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(compression, is hard)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(compression, is hard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(algorithm, is hard)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(algorithm, is hard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(compression, be hard for computers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(compression, be hard for computers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(bootstrap, is hard)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bootstrap, is easy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(bootstrap, is easy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(bootstrap, is easy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, is easy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, is hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bootstrap, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(method, is hard)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(programming language, is made hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(compression, is hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(algorithm, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(compression, be hard for computers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(method, is hard)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bootstrap, is hard)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(programming language, is made hard)