programming language: is made hard

Related concepts

Parents	language Weight: 0.81 , syntax Weight: 0.67 , computer science Weight: 0.67 , topic Weight: 0.64
Siblings	source code Weight: 0.69 , smalltalk Weight: 0.68 , perl Weight: 0.68 , lisp Weight: 0.67 , basic Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is made hard	1.00
is hard	0.91
is made	0.85
be hard for people	0.85
be made	0.83
be hard for many people	0.83
was made	0.83
is hard major	0.82
seem difficult	0.78
is difficult	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(computer science, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(programming language, is made hard)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(language, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(programming language, is made hard)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(computer science, is hard major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(programming language, is made hard)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(computer science, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(programming language, is made hard)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(programming language, is made hard)

...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(language, is hard)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(computer science, is hard)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(language, was made)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(computer science, be hard for people)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(computer science, be hard for many people)

...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(computer science, is hard)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be hard for many people)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(computer science, is hard major)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(language, is hard)

...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(lisp, is hard)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(perl, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(computer science, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(programming language, is made hard)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(language, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(programming language, is made hard)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(computer science, is hard major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(programming language, is made hard)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(programming language, is made hard)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(computer science, be hard for many people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(programming language, is made hard)

...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(perl, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(perl, is hard)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(lisp, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(lisp, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(programming language, is made hard)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(programming language, is made)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(programming language, is made)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(programming language, is made)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(programming language, be made)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(programming language, be made)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(programming language, is made hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(language, was made)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(computer science, be hard for people)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(computer science, be hard for many people)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(language, is hard)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(language, is difficult)

...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(perl, is hard)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(lisp, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(language, is hard)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(computer science, is hard)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(language, was made)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(computer science, be hard for people)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(programming language, is made hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(computer science, be hard for many people)

...