bootstrap: use negative margins

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.51
, framework
Weight: 0.47
, programming language
Weight: 0.47
, library
Weight: 0.45
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.32
, extraction
Weight: 0.31
, compression
Weight: 0.30
, ligation
Weight: 0.30
, fsck
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
use negative margins 1.00
use margins 0.95
does have negative margin 0.89
does have margin 0.82
have positive impact 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(method, have positive impact)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bootstrap, use negative margins)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(method, have positive impact)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(method, have positive impact)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(method, have positive impact)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(bootstrap, use negative margins)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(bootstrap, use negative margins)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(bootstrap, use margins)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, use margins)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bootstrap, use margins)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, does have margin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(bootstrap, does have margin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bootstrap, does have margin)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(bootstrap, use margins)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bootstrap, does have margin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, use negative margins)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bootstrap, use negative margins)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(method, have positive impact)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(bootstrap, use negative margins)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(method, have positive impact)