boss: fall in love

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.63
, relationship
Weight: 0.59
, title
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.57
Siblings manager
Weight: 0.63
, medusa
Weight: 0.48
, bowser
Weight: 0.47
, executioner
Weight: 0.40
, captain
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
fall in love 1.00
love zero 0.79
fall in love with secretaries 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(boss, fall in love)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(man, fall in love)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(man, fall in love)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(boss, fall in love)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(boss, fall in love)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(boss, love zero)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(boss, love zero)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(boss, love zero)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(boss, love zero)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(boss, fall in love with secretaries)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(boss, fall in love with secretaries)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(boss, fall in love with secretaries)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(boss, fall in love with secretaries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(boss, fall in love)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(boss, fall in love)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, fall in love)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(boss, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, fall in love)