bot: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer
Weight: 0.60
, computer program
Weight: 0.54
, parasite
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.48
Siblings computer virus
Weight: 0.35
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.34
, computer programmer
Weight: 0.34
, computer network
Weight: 0.34
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bot, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bot, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(parasite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bot, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(parasite, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(parasite, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bot, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(parasite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bot, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bot, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(bot, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(bot, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bot, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bot, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bot, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bot, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bot, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(parasite, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(parasite, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)