bottled water: be more expensive than pop

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drinking water
Weight: 0.78
, soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.74
, bottle
Weight: 0.68
, drinking
Weight: 0.66
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.39
, glass bottle
Weight: 0.37
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than pop 1.00
is more expensive 0.88
be more expensive than soda 0.84
be more popular than water 0.82
be more expensive than tap water 0.80
is expensive 0.80
cost more than soda 0.79
cost more than gas 0.79
be more expensive than gasoline 0.78
be more expensive than bottled soda 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(soft drink, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(soft drink, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(glass bottle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(glass bottle, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than soda)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than soda)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than soda)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than soda)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(bottled water, cost more than soda)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(bottled water, cost more than soda)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(bottled water, cost more than soda)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, cost more than soda)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than bottled soda)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than bottled soda)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than bottled soda)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than gasoline)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than gasoline)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than bottled soda)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than gasoline)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bottled water, be more popular than water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than gasoline)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bottled water, cost more than gas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than tap water)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bottled water, cost more than gas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be more popular than water)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than tap water)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than tap water)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more popular than water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, cost more than gas)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(bottled water, is more expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(bottled water, cost more than gas)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bottled water, be more popular than water)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than tap water)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(bottled water, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(glass bottle, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, is expensive)