bowl: be bad for fish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents form
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings toilet bowl
Weight: 0.60
, cup
Weight: 0.59
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, frying pan
Weight: 0.32
, ladle
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for fish 1.00
smell like fish 0.87
be bad for bettas 0.82
be go bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cup, smell like fish)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cup, smell like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cup, smell like fish)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cup, be go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(bowl, be bad for fish)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(bowl, be bad for bettas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bowl, be bad for bettas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(bowl, be bad for bettas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be bad for bettas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be bad for fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bowl, be bad for fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cup, smell like fish)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cup, be go bad)