cup: be go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.69
, item
Weight: 0.61
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.60
, bowl
Weight: 0.59
Siblings coffee cup
Weight: 0.73
, ramekin
Weight: 0.37
, jug
Weight: 0.35
, coffee mug
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be go bad 1.00
go bad 0.99
be bad for game 0.82
has quality bad 0.79
be bad for environment 0.78
is gone 0.78
is gone now 0.78
be are really used 0.77
be bad for fish 0.77
just go missing 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cup, be go bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cup, be go bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cup, be go bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(container, be are really used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cup, be go bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(container, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(container, be are really used)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(item, be bad for game)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(bowl, be bad for fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(container, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be bad for fish)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(item, be bad for game)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(container, be are really used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coffee mug, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(coffee cup, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coffee cup, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cup, be go bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bowl, be bad for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cup, be go bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cup, be go bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(container, be are really used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cup, be go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coffee mug, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coffee mug, go bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coffee cup, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(coffee cup, be bad for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(coffee cup, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(coffee cup, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cup, be go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cup, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(cup, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cup, be go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(container, be are really used)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bowl, be bad for fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coffee mug, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(coffee cup, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(coffee cup, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(container, be are really used)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(cup, be go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bowl, be bad for fish)