bowl: be in february

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents form
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings toilet bowl
Weight: 0.60
, cup
Weight: 0.59
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, frying pan
Weight: 0.32
, ladle
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in february 1.00
be in february now 0.98
be played on feb 1st 0.78
is xp 0.77
is uk 0.77
be in germany 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(event, be in germany)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bowl, be in february)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(event, be in germany)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(event, be in germany)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(event, be in germany)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(bowl, be in february)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(frying pan, is uk)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(frying pan, is uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(bowl, be in february)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(bowl, be in february now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be in february now)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(bowl, be in february now)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(bowl, be in february now)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bowl, be played on feb 1st)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be played on feb 1st)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(bowl, be played on feb 1st)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(bowl, be played on feb 1st)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be in february)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bowl, be in february)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(event, be in germany)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(frying pan, is uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(bowl, be in february)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(event, be in germany)