bowling ball: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ball
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.60
, sport
Weight: 0.59
, object
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tennis ball
Weight: 0.40
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.40
, golf ball
Weight: 0.39
, ball bearing
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality joke 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bowling ball, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sport, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sport, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, has quality joke)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bowling ball, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tennis ball, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, has quality joke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(bowling ball, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bowling ball, has quality joke)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(bowling ball, has quality joke)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bowling ball, has quality joke)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality joke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bowling ball, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ball bearing, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tennis ball, has quality joke)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(bowling ball, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)