ball bearing: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bearing
Weight: 0.78
, ball
Weight: 0.72
, projectile
Weight: 0.62
, application
Weight: 0.60
Siblings soccer ball
Weight: 0.40
, tennis ball
Weight: 0.40
, cue ball
Weight: 0.40
, golf ball
Weight: 0.39
, bowling ball
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality joke 0.80
go bad 0.79
be considered right bad 0.78
provide good high performance 0.76
feel good 0.76
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(bearing, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ball bearing, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bearing, go bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ball bearing, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(projectile, be considered right bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ball bearing, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(projectile, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ball bearing, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(bearing, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(projectile, be considered right bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(projectile, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(bearing, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(projectile, be considered right bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(projectile, has quality questions)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bearing, go bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bearing, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality joke)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tennis ball, has quality joke)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(bearing, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bearing, go bad)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(projectile, be considered right bad)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(projectile, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tennis ball, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bowling ball, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tennis ball, go bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, go bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tennis ball, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tennis ball, has quality joke)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(bowling ball, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bowling ball, has quality joke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ball bearing, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(ball bearing, go bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ball bearing, go bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ball bearing, go bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, go bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ball bearing, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(projectile, has quality questions)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(projectile, be considered right bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bearing, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(bearing, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tennis ball, go bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bowling ball, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tennis ball, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tennis ball, has quality joke)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bowling ball, has quality joke)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bearing, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(projectile, be considered right bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(bearing, go bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ball bearing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(projectile, has quality questions)