brain: be smaller than male ones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents neural network
Weight: 0.67
, body part
Weight: 0.67
, computer
Weight: 0.64
, tissue
Weight: 0.62
, nervous system
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pineal gland
Weight: 0.59
, thalamus
Weight: 0.48
, human brain
Weight: 0.39
, blood brain barrier
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be smaller than male ones 1.00
be more complex than animals 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(brain, be smaller than male ones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(human brain, be more complex than animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(brain, be smaller than male ones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(human brain, be more complex than animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(human brain, be more complex than animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(brain, be smaller than male ones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(brain, be smaller than male ones)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(brain, be smaller than male ones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(brain, be more complex than animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(brain, be smaller than male ones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(brain, be smaller than male ones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(brain, be more complex than animals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(brain, be smaller than male ones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(brain, be smaller than male ones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(brain, be smaller than male ones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(brain, be smaller than male ones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(brain, be smaller than male ones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(brain, be smaller than male ones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(brain, be smaller than male ones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(human brain, be more complex than animals)