brand: need logos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.68
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, symbol
Weight: 0.62
Siblings label
Weight: 0.70
, premium
Weight: 0.68
, hermes
Weight: 0.67
, chevrolet
Weight: 0.66
, pepsi
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
need logos 1.00
have logos 0.98
use logos 0.98
create logos 0.95
update logos 0.91
change logo 0.87
be more than logo 0.86
spend millions on logo 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(brand, need logos)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(brand, use logos)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(brand, have logos)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(brand, use logos)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brand, create logos)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(brand, have logos)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(brand, update logos)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(brand, use logos)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(brand, change logo)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brand, be more than logo)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(brand, use logos)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(brand, have logos)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(brand, spend millions on logo)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(brand, have logos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(brand, change logo)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(brand, create logos)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(brand, change logo)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(brand, change logo)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(brand, update logos)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(brand, create logos)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(brand, create logos)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(brand, be more than logo)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(brand, update logos)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(brand, update logos)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(brand, spend millions on logo)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(brand, be more than logo)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(brand, spend millions on logo)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(brand, be more than logo)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(brand, spend millions on logo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(brand, need logos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(brand, need logos)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(brand, need logos)