brandy: be served

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.65
, whiskey
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.61
, beverage
Weight: 0.59
, flavor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings rum
Weight: 0.38
, vodka
Weight: 0.37
, lager
Weight: 0.37
, bourbon
Weight: 0.37
, cider
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served 1.00
be served on days 0.93
be served warm 0.90
be served on hot days 0.88
be served over ice 0.87
be served in glasses 0.85
be best served ice cold 0.81
be served in snifter 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(cider, be served over ice)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(cider, be served over ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(cider, be served over ice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(brandy, be served)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(brandy, be served in snifter)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(brandy, be served in snifter)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served in snifter)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(brandy, be served in snifter)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served warm)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(brandy, be served warm)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(brandy, be served warm)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(brandy, be served warm)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(brandy, be served)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cider, be served over ice)