brazil: have population

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents argentina
Weight: 0.69
, south america
Weight: 0.65
, latin america
Weight: 0.65
, central american country
Weight: 0.64
, mexico
Weight: 0.62
Siblings uruguay
Weight: 0.49
, central america
Weight: 0.37
, saudi arabia
Weight: 0.36
, north america
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have population 1.00
have high population 0.95
have large population 0.94
have big population 0.94
have population density 0.89
compare in population 0.89
have largest population 0.88
have low population density 0.86
have population outside japan 0.84
have incredible population 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(brazil, have population)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mexico, have large population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(brazil, have population)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mexico, have population)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mexico, have large population)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have large population)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(brazil, have population)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mexico, have large population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(brazil, have population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(brazil, have population)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(brazil, have big population)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(brazil, have low population density)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(brazil, have low population density)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(brazil, have big population)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(brazil, have low population density)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(brazil, have low population density)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(brazil, have big population)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(brazil, have big population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(brazil, have population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(brazil, have population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mexico, have population)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mexico, have large population)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mexico, have population)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mexico, have large population)