mexico: have population

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new mexico
Weight: 0.76
, central american country
Weight: 0.69
, nation
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.61
, south america
Weight: 0.60
Siblings san diego
Weight: 0.66
, california
Weight: 0.62
, brazil
Weight: 0.62
, mexico city
Weight: 0.39
, nevada
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have population 1.00
have large population 0.94
lose population 0.92
have lower population 0.91
have populations 0.89
have hispanic population 0.85
have large hispanic population 0.85
have catholic populations 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mexico, have population)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(new mexico, have large population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mexico, have population)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(new mexico, have large hispanic population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mexico, have population)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(new mexico, lose population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mexico, have population)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new mexico, have hispanic population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mexico, have population)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(new mexico, lose population)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have population)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have hispanic population)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have large population)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have large hispanic population)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, lose population)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have hispanic population)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have large hispanic population)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have large population)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(california, have large hispanic population)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(brazil, have population)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mexico, have population)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(new mexico, have large population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mexico, have population)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(new mexico, lose population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mexico, have population)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(new mexico, have hispanic population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mexico, have population)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(new mexico, have large hispanic population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mexico, have population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(brazil, have population)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(california, have large hispanic population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(california, have large hispanic population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(mexico, have population)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have large population)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mexico, lose population)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(mexico, have large population)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mexico, lose population)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mexico, have population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new mexico, have population)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(new mexico, have large population)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new mexico, lose population)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(new mexico, have hispanic population)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(new mexico, have large hispanic population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(brazil, have population)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(california, have large hispanic population)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new mexico, have population)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(new mexico, have large population)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new mexico, lose population)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(new mexico, have hispanic population)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mexico, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(new mexico, have large hispanic population)