mexico: lose population

Related concepts

Parents	new mexico Weight: 0.76 , central american country Weight: 0.69 , nation Weight: 0.61 , city Weight: 0.61 , south america Weight: 0.60
Siblings	san diego Weight: 0.66 , california Weight: 0.62 , brazil Weight: 0.62 , mexico city Weight: 0.39 , nevada Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
lose population	1.00
have population	0.92
have lower population	0.88
have large population	0.87
have populations	0.81
have hispanic population	0.81
have large hispanic population	0.80
have catholic populations	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(new mexico, have large hispanic population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(mexico, lose population)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(new mexico, have large population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(mexico, lose population)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(new mexico, have population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(mexico, lose population)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(new mexico, have hispanic population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(mexico, lose population)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(new mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(mexico, lose population)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(new mexico, lose population)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(new mexico, have population)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(new mexico, have large population)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(new mexico, have hispanic population)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(new mexico, have large hispanic population)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, lose population)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have hispanic population)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have large hispanic population)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have large population)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(california, have large hispanic population)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(brazil, have population)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(new mexico, have large hispanic population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(mexico, lose population)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(new mexico, have large population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(mexico, lose population)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(new mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(mexico, lose population)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(new mexico, have population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(mexico, lose population)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(new mexico, have hispanic population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(mexico, lose population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(brazil, have population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(brazil, have population)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

Remarkable(california, have large hispanic population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(california, have large hispanic population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(mexico, lose population)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(mexico, have population)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(mexico, have population)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(mexico, have large population)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(mexico, have population)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(mexico, have large population)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(mexico, lose population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(new mexico, have population)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(new mexico, lose population)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(new mexico, have large population)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(new mexico, have hispanic population)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(new mexico, have large hispanic population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(brazil, have population)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(california, have large hispanic population)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(new mexico, lose population)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(new mexico, have population)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(new mexico, have large population)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(new mexico, have hispanic population)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(mexico, lose population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(new mexico, have large hispanic population)