new mexico: have population

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents texas
Weight: 0.74
, mexico
Weight: 0.73
, north america
Weight: 0.69
, country
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nevada
Weight: 0.68
, los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.67
, san diego
Weight: 0.67
, colorado
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
have population 1.00
have large population 0.94
lose population 0.92
have hispanic population 0.85
have large hispanic population 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new mexico, have population)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(texas, have population)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new mexico, have population)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mexico, have large population)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new mexico, have population)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(texas, have large population)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new mexico, have population)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mexico, lose population)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new mexico, have population)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(texas, have large hispanic population)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new mexico, have population)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(texas, have hispanic population)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new mexico, have population)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(texas, have hispanic population)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(texas, have population)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mexico, have population)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(texas, have large hispanic population)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(texas, have large population)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mexico, lose population)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mexico, have large population)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mexico, lose population)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(texas, have hispanic population)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(texas, have large hispanic population)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(texas, have large population)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have large population)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(texas, have population)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico, have population)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(california, have large hispanic population)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have population)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(texas, have population)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have population)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mexico, have large population)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have population)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(texas, have large population)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have population)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mexico, lose population)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have population)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(texas, have hispanic population)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have population)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(texas, have large hispanic population)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(california, have large hispanic population)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(california, have large hispanic population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(new mexico, have population)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have large population)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, lose population)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(new mexico, lose population)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(new mexico, lose population)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have hispanic population)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have large hispanic population)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(new mexico, have hispanic population)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(new mexico, have large population)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have hispanic population)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new mexico, lose population)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(new mexico, have hispanic population)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have large population)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(new mexico, have large population)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(new mexico, have large hispanic population)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(new mexico, have large hispanic population)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(new mexico, have large hispanic population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new mexico, have population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(texas, have population)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mexico, have population)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(texas, have hispanic population)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(texas, have large hispanic population)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(texas, have large population)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mexico, have large population)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mexico, lose population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(california, have large hispanic population)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(texas, have population)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mexico, have population)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(texas, have hispanic population)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(texas, have large hispanic population)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(texas, have large population)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mexico, have large population)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(new mexico, have population)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mexico, lose population)