breast cancer: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents breast
Weight: 0.78
, prostate cancer
Weight: 0.76
, heart disease
Weight: 0.75
, tumor
Weight: 0.72
, illness
Weight: 0.72
Siblings lung cancer
Weight: 0.80
, lymphoma
Weight: 0.60
, skin cancer
Weight: 0.40
, liver cancer
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(breast cancer, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(breast cancer, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(tumor, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(heart disease, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lymphoma, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lung cancer, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(skin cancer, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(breast cancer, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(breast cancer, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(skin cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(skin cancer, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(lung cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lung cancer, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lymphoma, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(lymphoma, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(breast cancer, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(breast cancer, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tumor, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lung cancer, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(skin cancer, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lymphoma, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(breast cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tumor, has quality bad)