tumor: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents abnormality
Weight: 0.64
, spinal cord
Weight: 0.58
, pancreas
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cyst
Weight: 0.66
, melanoma
Weight: 0.63
, stomach
Weight: 0.59
, liver cancer
Weight: 0.35
, adrenal gland
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is bad people 0.80
has quality function 0.76
has quality definition 0.75
is fat bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pancreas, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tumor, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tumor, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pancreas, has quality function)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(melanoma, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cyst, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pancreas, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(tumor, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(tumor, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cyst, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cyst, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(melanoma, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(melanoma, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tumor, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tumor, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pancreas, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cyst, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(melanoma, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pancreas, has quality function)