pancreas: has quality function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents endocrine gland
Weight: 0.71
, gland
Weight: 0.67
, endocrine system
Weight: 0.65
, organ
Weight: 0.62
, tumor
Weight: 0.57
Siblings adrenal gland
Weight: 0.39
, salivary gland
Weight: 0.39
, pineal gland
Weight: 0.38
, sebaceous gland
Weight: 0.38
, prostate gland
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality function 1.00
be in function 0.92
has quality good 0.78
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pancreas, has quality function)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pancreas, has quality function)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pancreas, has quality function)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tumor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pancreas, has quality function)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(organ, be in function)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pancreas, has quality function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(gland, has quality function)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(organ, be in function)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(tumor, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(gland, has quality function)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality function)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(organ, be in function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pancreas, has quality function)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pancreas, has quality function)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(organ, be in function)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pancreas, has quality function)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pancreas, has quality function)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tumor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pancreas, has quality function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pancreas, has quality function)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pancreas, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(organ, be in function)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(endocrine gland, has quality function)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gland, has quality function)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tumor, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(endocrine gland, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(endocrine gland, has quality function)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(organ, be in function)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gland, has quality function)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(endocrine gland, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tumor, has quality bad)