endocrine gland: has quality function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.65
, organ
Weight: 0.64
, gland
Weight: 0.56
, body
Weight: 0.48
, part
Weight: 0.48
Siblings adrenal gland
Weight: 0.87
, thyroid
Weight: 0.74
, pancreas
Weight: 0.71
, hypothalamus
Weight: 0.70
, central nervous system
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality function 1.00
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(endocrine gland, has quality function)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tissue, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(endocrine gland, has quality function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(gland, has quality function)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(gland, has quality function)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tissue, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pancreas, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pancreas, has quality function)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(endocrine gland, has quality function)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(endocrine gland, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(endocrine gland, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(endocrine gland, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gland, has quality function)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pancreas, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gland, has quality function)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(endocrine gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)