spinal cord: has quality function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents peripheral nervous system
Weight: 0.69
, nerve
Weight: 0.66
, ligament
Weight: 0.66
, cord
Weight: 0.65
, body part
Weight: 0.64
Siblings optic nerve
Weight: 0.71
, sciatic nerve
Weight: 0.68
, motor neuron
Weight: 0.57
, extension cord
Weight: 0.38
, achilles tendon
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality function 1.00
be similar in function 0.86
is quality 0.80
has quality good 0.78
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cord, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(nerve, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nerve, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spinal cord, has quality function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(nerve, has quality function)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(nerve, be similar in function)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cord, has quality function)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cord, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(nerve, be similar in function)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cord, has quality function)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(nerve, has quality function)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cord, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(motor neuron, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(nerve, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cord, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(nerve, be similar in function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(motor neuron, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(motor neuron, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(spinal cord, has quality function)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(spinal cord, is quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spinal cord, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(nerve, has quality function)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(nerve, be similar in function)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cord, has quality function)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cord, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(motor neuron, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(nerve, has quality function)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(nerve, be similar in function)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cord, has quality function)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cord, is quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(spinal cord, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)