bribery: be legal in zealand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.60
, charge
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.58
, practice
Weight: 0.57
, felony
Weight: 0.57
Siblings corruption
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, perjury
Weight: 0.33
, money laundering
Weight: 0.33
, conspiracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be legal in zealand 1.00
be legal in new zealand 0.98
be legal in america 0.82
be in australia 0.78
is legal 0.77
be high in australia 0.77
be legal in america for politicians 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bribery, be legal in zealand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(issue, be in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is legal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(bribery, be legal in zealand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(corruption, is legal)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(corruption, is legal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(bribery, be legal in zealand)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be legal in new zealand)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(bribery, be legal in new zealand)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(bribery, be legal in new zealand)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(bribery, be legal in america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(bribery, be legal in new zealand)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bribery, be legal in america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(bribery, be legal in america)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be legal in america)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be legal in america for politicians)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(bribery, be legal in america for politicians)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bribery, be legal in america for politicians)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(bribery, be legal in america for politicians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be legal in zealand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bribery, be legal in zealand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(issue, be in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(corruption, is legal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(bribery, be legal in zealand)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(issue, be in australia)