:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bristol, smell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(charleston, smell)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bristol, smell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, smell)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(bristol, smell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(bristol, smell)
Similarity expansion
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(bristol, smell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(bristol, stink)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bristol, smell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bristol, stink)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(bristol, smell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(bristol, stink)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bristol, smell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bristol, stink)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(bristol, smell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bristol, smell)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bristol, smell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(charleston, smell)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bristol, smell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(birmingham, smell)