bristol: stink

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents port
Weight: 0.58
, town
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, city
Weight: 0.57
, area
Weight: 0.56
Siblings charleston
Weight: 0.34
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.33
, lancaster
Weight: 0.33
, birmingham
Weight: 0.33
, springfield
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
stink 1.00
smell 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bristol, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(charleston, smell)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bristol, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, smell)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bristol, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(birmingham, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(birmingham, smell)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bristol, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(charleston, smell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(charleston, smell)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bristol, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(bristol, stink)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(bristol, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bristol, smell)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bristol, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(bristol, smell)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(bristol, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bristol, smell)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(bristol, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(bristol, smell)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(bristol, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bristol, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bristol, stink)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bristol, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bristol, stink)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bristol, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(charleston, smell)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bristol, stink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(birmingham, smell)