bronze: was big improvement making

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents finish
Weight: 0.63
, color
Weight: 0.62
, award
Weight: 0.60
, alloy
Weight: 0.59
, metal
Weight: 0.56
Siblings medal
Weight: 0.36
, silver
Weight: 0.35
, trophy
Weight: 0.34
, turquoise
Weight: 0.33
, amethyst
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was big improvement making 1.00
was better as material use making 0.76
is made 0.76
be used making 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(alloy, is made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(bronze, was big improvement making)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(alloy, be used making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(bronze, was big improvement making)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(alloy, be used making)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(alloy, is made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(alloy, be used making)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(alloy, is made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(trophy, is made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(alloy, is made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bronze, was big improvement making)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(alloy, be used making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bronze, was big improvement making)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(trophy, is made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trophy, is made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(bronze, was big improvement making)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(bronze, be used making)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bronze, be used making)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bronze, is made)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(bronze, be used making)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bronze, was better as material use making)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(bronze, was better as material use making)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(bronze, is made)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bronze, be used making)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(bronze, is made)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(bronze, is made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was big improvement making)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(bronze, was big improvement making)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(alloy, be used making)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(alloy, is made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(trophy, is made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(alloy, be used making)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(bronze, was big improvement making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(alloy, is made)