brother: cutting to fish tank

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wife
Weight: 0.67
, lover
Weight: 0.65
, musician
Weight: 0.65
, family
Weight: 0.64
Siblings big brother
Weight: 0.77
, father
Weight: 0.76
, nephew
Weight: 0.66
, cousin
Weight: 0.66
, uncle
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
cutting to fish tank 1.00
go to fish tank 0.92
go to fish 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(big brother, go to fish tank)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(big brother, go to fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(big brother, go to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(big brother, go to fish tank)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(big brother, go to fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(big brother, go to fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(brother, cutting to fish tank)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(brother, go to fish tank)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(brother, go to fish tank)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(brother, go to fish tank)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(brother, go to fish tank)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(brother, go to fish)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(brother, go to fish)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(brother, go to fish)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(brother, go to fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(brother, cutting to fish tank)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(brother, cutting to fish tank)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(big brother, go to fish tank)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(brother, cutting to fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(big brother, go to fish)