budget: be important for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, proposal
Weight: 0.62
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.35
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, amendment
Weight: 0.33
, agenda
Weight: 0.33
, blueprint
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for business 1.00
be important to marketing 0.79
be important in government 0.77
be important in project management 0.77
be important for event 0.76
be useful in planning process 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(document, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(budget, be important for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(budget, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(document, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(budget, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(document, be important for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(document, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(budget, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(budget, be important for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(budget, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(budget, be important for business)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(budget, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(budget, be important to marketing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(budget, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(budget, be important in government)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(budget, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(budget, be important in project management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(budget, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(budget, be important for event)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(budget, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(budget, be useful in planning process)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(budget, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(budget, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(budget, be important for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(budget, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(budget, be important for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(budget, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(document, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(budget, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(document, be important for business)