budget: be important to marketing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, proposal
Weight: 0.62
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.35
, plan
Weight: 0.34
, amendment
Weight: 0.33
, agenda
Weight: 0.33
, blueprint
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to marketing 1.00
be important for business 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(document, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(budget, be important to marketing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(budget, be important to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(document, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(budget, be important to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(document, be important for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(document, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(budget, be important to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(budget, be important to marketing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(budget, be important to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(budget, be important to marketing)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(budget, be important to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(budget, be important for business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(budget, be important to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(budget, be important for business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(budget, be important to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(budget, be important for business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(budget, be important to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(budget, be important for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(budget, be important to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(budget, be important to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(budget, be important to marketing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(budget, be important to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(budget, be important to marketing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(budget, be important to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(document, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(budget, be important to marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(document, be important for business)