buffet: be used to not tip waitress

Related concepts

Parents	place Weight: 0.56 , furniture Weight: 0.55 , restaurant Weight: 0.51 , meal Weight: 0.50
Siblings	fast food restaurant Weight: 0.34 , seafood restaurant Weight: 0.34 , steakhouse Weight: 0.34 , dinner Weight: 0.33 , breakfast Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be used to not tip waitress	1.00
has waiter	0.83
be at fast-food restaurant	0.75
be at restaurant	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(buffet, be used to not tip waitress)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(restaurant, has waiter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(buffet, be used to not tip waitress)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(meal, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(buffet, be used to not tip waitress)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(restaurant, has waiter)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has waiter)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(restaurant, has waiter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(buffet, be used to not tip waitress)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(buffet, be used to not tip waitress)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(meal, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(buffet, be used to not tip waitress)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(buffet, be used to not tip waitress)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(buffet, be at restaurant)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(buffet, be at restaurant)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(buffet, be at restaurant)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(buffet, be at restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(buffet, be used to not tip waitress)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(buffet, be used to not tip waitress)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(restaurant, has waiter)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(restaurant, has waiter)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(buffet, be used to not tip waitress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)