restaurant: be at restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.68
, institution
Weight: 0.64
, accommodation
Weight: 0.64
, food store
Weight: 0.62
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.80
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at restaurant 1.00
be at hotel 0.80
be used to shop for food 0.78
be at shop mall 0.78
be used to eat pizza 0.78
be defined as plural of restaurant 0.78
has waiter 0.78
has bar 0.77
be used to have steak dinner 0.76
has pasta dish on menu 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(food store, be used to shop for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(accommodation, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be at hotel)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(food store, be used to shop for food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be at hotel)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food store, be used to shop for food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at shop mall)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to have steak dinner)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(food store, be used to shop for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(accommodation, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to have steak dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be used to have steak dinner)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at shop mall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at shop mall)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(restaurant, be at shop mall)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at shop mall)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at shop mall)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(restaurant, has waiter)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(restaurant, has bar)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(restaurant, has waiter)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(restaurant, has bar)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has waiter)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has bar)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(restaurant, has bar)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(restaurant, has waiter)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at hotel)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(restaurant, be defined as plural of restaurant)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at shop mall)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(food store, be used to shop for food)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(accommodation, be at hotel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to have steak dinner)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat pizza)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at shop mall)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(food store, be used to shop for food)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(accommodation, be at hotel)