restaurant: has bar

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.68
, institution
Weight: 0.64
, accommodation
Weight: 0.64
, food store
Weight: 0.62
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.80
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
has bar 1.00
has bar sometimes 0.89
has bar to attract customer 0.81
be at restaurant 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, has bar sometimes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, has bar sometimes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, has bar sometimes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(restaurant, has bar)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(restaurant, has bar to attract customer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(restaurant, has bar to attract customer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has bar to attract customer)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(restaurant, has bar to attract customer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has bar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(restaurant, has bar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, has bar sometimes)