buffet: go out of business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.56
, furniture
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.54
, restaurant
Weight: 0.51
Siblings dining table
Weight: 0.34
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.34
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
go out of business 1.00
stay in business 0.87
run out of food 0.77
running out of food 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(restaurant, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(buffet, go out of business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(restaurant, run out of food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(buffet, go out of business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(restaurant, running out of food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(buffet, go out of business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(restaurant, go out of business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(restaurant, run out of food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(restaurant, running out of food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, go out of business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, run out of food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, running out of food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(restaurant, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(buffet, go out of business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(restaurant, run out of food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(buffet, go out of business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(restaurant, running out of food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(buffet, go out of business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(buffet, go out of business)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(buffet, stay in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(buffet, stay in business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(buffet, stay in business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(buffet, stay in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(buffet, go out of business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(buffet, go out of business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(restaurant, go out of business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(restaurant, run out of food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(restaurant, running out of food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(restaurant, go out of business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(restaurant, run out of food)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(buffet, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(restaurant, running out of food)