buffet: has quality price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.56
, furniture
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.54
, restaurant
Weight: 0.51
Siblings dining table
Weight: 0.34
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.34
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality price 1.00
has quality prices 0.93
has quality good 0.80
is dinner price 0.79
has quality bad 0.78
have time value 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(option, have time value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(buffet, has quality price)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(option, have time value)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(option, have time value)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(option, have time value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(buffet, has quality price)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(buffet, has quality price)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(buffet, has quality prices)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality prices)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(buffet, has quality prices)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(buffet, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(buffet, has quality prices)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(buffet, is dinner price)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(buffet, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(buffet, is dinner price)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(buffet, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(buffet, is dinner price)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(buffet, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(buffet, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(buffet, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(buffet, is dinner price)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(buffet, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(option, have time value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(buffet, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(option, have time value)