buffet: has quality prices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.56
, furniture
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.54
, restaurant
Weight: 0.51
Siblings dining table
Weight: 0.34
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.34
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality prices 1.00
has quality price 0.93
has quality good 0.78
has quality bad 0.77
be cheaper than stocks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(option, be cheaper than stocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(buffet, has quality prices)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(option, be cheaper than stocks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(option, be cheaper than stocks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(option, be cheaper than stocks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(buffet, has quality prices)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(buffet, has quality prices)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(buffet, has quality price)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality price)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(buffet, has quality price)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(buffet, has quality price)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(buffet, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(buffet, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(buffet, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(buffet, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(buffet, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(buffet, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality prices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(buffet, has quality prices)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, be cheaper than stocks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(buffet, has quality prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, be cheaper than stocks)