builder: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.56
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34
, developer
Weight: 0.33
, plumber
Weight: 0.33
, engineer
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
have under threat jobs 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contractor, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(builder, has state jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contractor, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(architect, has state jobs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(architect, have under threat jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contractor, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(builder, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(architect, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(architect, has state jobs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(architect, have under threat jobs)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(architect, have under threat jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(builder, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(builder, have under threat jobs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(builder, have under threat jobs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(builder, have under threat jobs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(builder, have under threat jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(builder, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(contractor, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(architect, have under threat jobs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(architect, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(builder, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(contractor, has state jobs)