builder: has state jobs

Related concepts

Parents	contractor Weight: 0.63 , person Weight: 0.60 , third party Weight: 0.59 , service Weight: 0.56
Siblings	architect Weight: 0.35 , construction worker Weight: 0.34 , developer Weight: 0.33 , plumber Weight: 0.33 , engineer Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has state jobs	1.00
have under threat jobs	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(builder, has state jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(contractor, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(architect, has state jobs)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(architect, have under threat jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(builder, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(architect, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(architect, has state jobs)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(architect, have under threat jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(architect, have under threat jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(builder, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(builder, have under threat jobs)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.90

Salient(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(builder, have under threat jobs)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(builder, have under threat jobs)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(builder, have under threat jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Salient(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(builder, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(contractor, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(architect, have under threat jobs)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(architect, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(contractor, has state jobs)