contractor: has state jobs

Related concepts

Parents	construction worker Weight: 0.70 , workman Weight: 0.63 , professional Weight: 0.61 , employee Weight: 0.61
Siblings	architect Weight: 0.71 , engineer Weight: 0.65 , builder Weight: 0.63 , plumber Weight: 0.63 , agent Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has state jobs	1.00
jobs	0.94
has state job	0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(construction worker, has state job) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(contractor, has state jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(construction worker, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(architect, has state jobs)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(engineer, has state job)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(architect, has state job)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(architect, jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(construction worker, has state job) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(contractor, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(architect, jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(architect, jobs)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(architect, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(architect, has state jobs)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(builder, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(builder, has state jobs)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(architect, has state job) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(architect, has state job)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(engineer, has state job) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(engineer, has state job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(contractor, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(contractor, jobs)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(contractor, jobs)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(contractor, jobs)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(contractor, has state job)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(contractor, has state job)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(contractor, has state job)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(contractor, jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(contractor, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(construction worker, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(architect, jobs)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(architect, has state jobs)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(architect, has state job)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(engineer, has state job)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(builder, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(contractor, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(construction worker, has state job)