contractor: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, workman
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, builder
Weight: 0.63
, plumber
Weight: 0.63
, agent
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
has state jobs 0.88
jobs 0.78
is work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(construction worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(contractor, has state job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(construction worker, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(engineer, has state job)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(architect, has state jobs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(builder, has state jobs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(architect, has state job)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(plumber, is work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(architect, jobs)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(construction worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(contractor, has state job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(architect, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(architect, has state job)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(engineer, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(engineer, has state job)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(architect, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(architect, jobs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(architect, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(architect, has state jobs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(architect, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(architect, is work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(plumber, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plumber, is work)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(builder, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(builder, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(contractor, has state job)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(contractor, jobs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(contractor, is work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(contractor, jobs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state jobs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(contractor, is work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(contractor, jobs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(contractor, has state jobs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(contractor, is work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contractor, has state jobs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(contractor, has state jobs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, jobs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(contractor, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(construction worker, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(architect, jobs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(architect, is work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(architect, has state job)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(engineer, has state job)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(architect, has state jobs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(plumber, is work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(builder, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(contractor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(construction worker, has state job)