construction worker: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.74
, project
Weight: 0.67
, contractor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.70
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, roofer
Weight: 0.63
, mason
Weight: 0.63
, electrician
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
find jobs 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(construction worker, has state job)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(construction worker, has state job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(contractor, has state job)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(worker, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(worker, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(engineer, has state job)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(construction worker, has state job)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(construction worker, has state job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(engineer, has state job)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(engineer, has state job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(construction worker, has state job)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, find jobs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, find jobs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(construction worker, find jobs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(construction worker, find jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(construction worker, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(contractor, has state job)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(worker, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(engineer, has state job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(contractor, has state job)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(worker, has state job)