worker: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, poor people
Weight: 0.61
, supervisor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.88
, office worker
Weight: 0.81
, nurse
Weight: 0.71
, janitor
Weight: 0.71
, bus driver
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
is good job 0.91
leave jobs 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(supervisor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(worker, has state job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(supervisor, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(nurse, leave jobs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(supervisor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(worker, has state job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(construction worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(construction worker, has state job)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(nurse, leave jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(nurse, leave jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(worker, has state job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(worker, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(worker, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(supervisor, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(construction worker, has state job)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(nurse, leave jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(supervisor, has state job)