contractor: is work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, workman
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, builder
Weight: 0.63
, plumber
Weight: 0.63
, agent
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is work 1.00
work 0.98
has state job 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(employee, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(contractor, is work)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(workman, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(contractor, is work)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(construction worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(contractor, is work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(workman, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(construction worker, has state job)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(employee, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(employee, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(workman, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(engineer, has state job)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(architect, has state job)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(plumber, is work)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(agent, work)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(architect, work)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(employee, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(contractor, is work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(workman, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(contractor, is work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(construction worker, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(contractor, is work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(architect, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(architect, is work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(architect, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(architect, work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(agent, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(agent, work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(plumber, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plumber, is work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(architect, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(architect, has state job)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(engineer, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(engineer, has state job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(contractor, is work)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(contractor, work)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(contractor, work)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(contractor, work)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(contractor, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(contractor, has state job)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(contractor, has state job)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(contractor, has state job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(contractor, is work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(workman, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(employee, work)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(construction worker, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(architect, is work)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(architect, work)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(agent, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(architect, has state job)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(plumber, is work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(engineer, has state job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(workman, work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(employee, work)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(contractor, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(construction worker, has state job)