builder: quote without vat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.56
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34
, developer
Weight: 0.33
, plumber
Weight: 0.33
, engineer
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
quote without vat 1.00
charge vat 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(contractor, charge vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(builder, quote without vat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(builder, quote without vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(contractor, charge vat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(builder, quote without vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(contractor, charge vat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(contractor, charge vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(builder, quote without vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(builder, quote without vat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(builder, quote without vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(builder, quote without vat)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(builder, quote without vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(builder, charge vat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(builder, quote without vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(builder, charge vat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(builder, quote without vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(builder, charge vat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(builder, quote without vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(builder, charge vat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(builder, quote without vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(builder, quote without vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(builder, quote without vat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(builder, quote without vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(builder, quote without vat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(builder, quote without vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(contractor, charge vat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(builder, quote without vat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(contractor, charge vat)