bully: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.61
, challenge
Weight: 0.57
, title
Weight: 0.55
, situation
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cop
Weight: 0.55
, bullying
Weight: 0.35
, shame
Weight: 0.32
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.32
, gang
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is big problem 0.88
is issue 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bullying, is big problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(gang, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bullying, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(gang, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(gang, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bullying, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(bullying, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(bullying, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bullying, is big problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(bullying, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(bullying, is issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(bully, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(bully, is big problem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bully, is big problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(bully, is big problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bully, is issue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(bully, is issue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(bully, is issue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bully, is big problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(bully, is issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bully, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bully, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(gang, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(bullying, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(bullying, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bully, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bullying, is big problem)