burning: be different burning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, practice
Weight: 0.58
, accident
Weight: 0.57
, discomfort
Weight: 0.57
Siblings explosion
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.32
, campfire
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different burning 1.00
be worse burning 0.91
burn 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(burning, be different burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(campfire, burn)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(burning, be different burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(campfire, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(campfire, burn)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(burning, be different burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(burning, be different burning)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(burning, be different burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(burning, be worse burning)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(burning, be different burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(burning, be worse burning)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(burning, be different burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(burning, be worse burning)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(burning, be different burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(burning, be worse burning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(burning, be different burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(burning, be different burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(burning, be different burning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(burning, be different burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(burning, be different burning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(burning, be different burning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(campfire, burn)