burning: be worse burning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, practice
Weight: 0.58
, accident
Weight: 0.57
, discomfort
Weight: 0.57
Siblings explosion
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.32
, campfire
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse burning 1.00
be different burning 0.91
burn 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(burning, be worse burning)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(campfire, burn)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(burning, be worse burning)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(campfire, burn)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(campfire, burn)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(burning, be worse burning)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(burning, be worse burning)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(burning, be worse burning)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(burning, be different burning)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(burning, be worse burning)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(burning, be different burning)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(burning, be worse burning)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(burning, be different burning)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(burning, be worse burning)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(burning, be different burning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(burning, be worse burning)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(burning, be worse burning)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(burning, be worse burning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(burning, be worse burning)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(burning, be worse burning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(burning, be worse burning)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(campfire, burn)