burning: is hazardous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, practice
Weight: 0.58
, accident
Weight: 0.57
, discomfort
Weight: 0.57
Siblings explosion
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.32
, campfire
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hazardous 1.00
is dangerous 0.84
is harmful 0.79
be harmful 0.79
act dangerous 0.77
is dangerous underwater 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, act dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(burning, is hazardous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(method, act dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(method, act dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(campfire, is dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is dangerous underwater)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is harmful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, act dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(burning, is hazardous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(explosion, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(explosion, is dangerous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(campfire, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(campfire, is dangerous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(combustion, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(combustion, is dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(combustion, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(combustion, is harmful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(explosion, is dangerous underwater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(explosion, is dangerous underwater)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(burning, is hazardous)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(burning, is dangerous)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(burning, is dangerous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(burning, is harmful)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(burning, be harmful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(burning, be harmful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(burning, is harmful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(burning, is dangerous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(burning, is harmful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(burning, be harmful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(burning, be harmful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(burning, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, is hazardous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(burning, is hazardous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(method, act dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(combustion, is harmful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(explosion, is dangerous underwater)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(campfire, is dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(explosion, is dangerous)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(combustion, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(burning, is hazardous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(method, act dangerous)