:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Property |
Similarity |
go bad |
1.00 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bushing, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(valve, go bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bushing, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rotor, go bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bushing, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(caliper, go bad)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(bushing, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(bushing, go bad)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(bushing, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bushing, go bad)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bushing, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(valve, go bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bushing, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(caliper, go bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bushing, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rotor, go bad)